Adam Inlay Web Design and Marketing — home

Section 508 websites for public agencies

Public sector web work runs on rules, deadlines, and a procurement process that keeps its own calendar. We have written the proposals, sat through the scoring, and done the remediation that follows.

What new public sector clients ask us to fix first

The same three problems come up on almost every first call, whether you are a town or county department, a school division, a public library, a parks or transit authority, a board or commission, or a contractor building on behalf of one.

Standards differ by entity type

The 2017 Section 508 refresh points to WCAG 2.0 AA. The ADA Title II rule adopted WCAG 2.1 AA for state and local government. Knowing which applies to you comes first.

PDFs carry the agenda

Meeting minutes, budgets, and notices posted as scanned PDFs. Screen readers get nothing, search engines get nothing, and residents cannot read the document that affects them.

Plain language never happened

Pages written by the department that owns the program, in the vocabulary of the statute. A resident trying to renew a permit reads it twice and calls the front counter.

What we build for you

The pieces that matter most in this field, in the order they usually matter, whether the website serves residents, staff, or a compliance reviewer working through a checklist.

Which procurement inquiries are a fit

Public work has a filter step that private work does not. A fit inquiry shows its funding, its standard, and its timeline up front.

A lead worth having

  • A township or authority in Virginia, Maryland, or DC with a named project manager and a funded line item.
  • An RFP released with a realistic question deadline, published scoring criteria, and a scope that names the standard it wants.
  • A staff member searching 'Section 508 remediation vendor' after an internal review flagged specific pages and documents.
  • A redesign inquiry that arrives eight to twelve months ahead of the fiscal year the work is budgeted in.

What a wasted click looks like

  • Solicitations that require a VPAT or an accessibility statement as a deliverable. We do not produce either, so we pass.
  • An RFP written around an overlay widget. Overlays leave the underlying code broken, so we do not bid those.
  • A scope drafted without the standard named, which turns into three rounds of clarification and a scoring committee guessing.

Our track record in public work

We have written government proposals, answered the question rounds, and delivered 508 projects, so the process itself is familiar. Requirements differ by entity type, and we say which one applies before scoping anything. Two things we are plain about: we do not produce VPATs or accessibility statements, and we do not install overlay widgets, because an overlay leaves the underlying markup exactly as broken as it was.

See how a project runs →
  • Audits and remediation, done by hand and verified
  • Built to WCAG 2.2 AA, above the current floor
  • No overlays, no VPATs, no accessibility statements

Common questions

Send us the solicitation or the scope

We will tell you whether it is a fit, which standard applies to your entity, and what the remediation would actually involve. No obligation either way.